Edinburgh Napier University

  Background
Intensive care units deliver care to a heterogeneous group of patients with pre-existing co-morbid disease. Focus has shifted to improving health related quality of life with more patients surviving beyond hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials evaluating follow-up interventions, to improve physical recovery, have not demonstrated a health-related quality of life benefit. Qualitative research may provide the context to understand the experiences of intensive care survivors during follow-up care addressing physical limitations.

Objective
To synthesise qualitative studies and explore Intensive Care survivors’ experiences and perspectives of physical symptoms in the context of follow-up care.

Setting(s)
A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Ovid Nursing and Ovid Emcare) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed primary qualitative studies. No date parameters were applied. Inclusion/exclusion criteria guided the screening process.

Participants
The data from eligible primary research studies was extracted into NVivo (v12).

Methods
Critical appraisal was completed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke (2022), informed the data synthesis.

Results
From 2457 studies, ten relevant studies were included. Two main themes were identified: 1. Recovery as uncertain; which outlines the uncertainty experienced by intensive care unit survivors during recovery. This theme pertained to system-level factors (role of healthcare professional and information provision) which provides the context for delivering follow-up care. 2. Self-determination of recovery; outlines individual characteristics in determining recovery which is conceptualised by patient-level factors (motivation, support network and perception of health).

Conclusions
For intensive care survivors, the recovery trajectory is uncertain with a gap in information provision during the acute phase following hospital discharge. Patients’ self-determination of recovery is an important consideration to ensure follow-up care addresses the needs of individual patients. The impact of pre-existing co-morbid disease and subgroups of patients deriving benefit from follow-up care remains uncertain.