Research Output
An examination of the lived experience of attending twelve step groups for co-dependency
  This research project aimed at obtaining an in-depth analysis of the experiences of self-identified co-dependents, who chose twelve-steps groups as a way for dealing with difficulties identified as co-dependency. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used as the methodology for the research. Eight participants volunteered from local support groups for co-dependency in the UK. Data were collected through 3 in-depth interviews with each participant over a period of 3–6 months. A visual method was used to gain a more in-depth phenomenological perspective. It included photographs, drawings and images chosen by the participants to describe their experiences. The analysis revealed 2 contradicting and complementary themes: (1) representations of the twelve-step group as a helpful tool and (2) representations of the twelve-step group as no longer meaningful. It demonstrated that the participants found their groups useful as an initial pathway for recovery; however, it did not feature as a central aspect in their recovery, as different levels of engagement were described. The results of this study provide a base for developing a more empathic and contextualised understanding of the experience of individuals who attend twelve-step groups for co-dependency, which in turn will enable health professionals to offer support which is relevant to these individuals’ experiences.

Co-dependency is a contested psychological concept associated with addictive behaviours. It is a multifactorial problem characterised by a constellation of factors identified as differentiation of self, self-sacrifice, external locus of control, interpersonal conflict and control and emotional constraint (Lampis et al. 2017; Dear and Roberts 2005). Evidence suggests that these factors are typically found in the lives of adults who grew up in dysfunctional families, for example where substance abuse prevailed (Abadi, Maarefvand, Aghaei et al. 2017; Bortolon et al. 2017; Sarkar et al. 2015; Marks et al. 2012).

A systematic review of literature in co-dependency offered a summary of various treatment perspectives based on individual and group therapy modalities (Ahmad-Abadi, Vand and Aghaee 2015). The twelve-step group appears to be the preferred pathway for helping individuals who identify with this problem (Askian et al. 2016, 2018; Sohrabnejad et al. 2018; Abadi et al. 2015).

However, our review of literature in co-dependency demonstrated that to this date, to our knowledge, the voices and experiences of individuals who attend twelve-step groups have not been included in the discussion, therefore indicating the need for an in-depth analysis of the perspectives of self-identified co-dependents, who chose the twelve-step group as a way for dealing with difficulties identified as co-dependency. Their experiences of the twelve-step recovery groups will illuminate professionals who work in this field, suggesting ways to support people who consider themselves to be co-dependents and who chose the twelve-step group pathway for recovery.

  • Type:

    Article

  • Date:

    08 April 2020

  • Publication Status:

    Published

  • DOI:

    10.1007/s11469-020-00253-9

  • ISSN:

    1557-1874

  • Funders:

    Edinburgh Napier Funded

Citation

Bacon, I., McKay, E. A., Reynolds, F., & McIntyre, A. (2021). An examination of the lived experience of attending twelve step groups for co-dependency. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 1646-1661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00253-9

Authors

Keywords

Co-dependency, Twelve-step groups, Recovery, Phenomenology, Lived experience

Monthly Views:

Available Documents
  • pdf

    An Examination Of The Lived Experience Of Attending Twelve Step Groups For Co-dependency

    335KB

    This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

  • Downloadable citations

    HTML BIB RTF